Skip to the card

Card 960 of 9992026-08-27 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-08-27

What Went Wrong? — The AI Output Debugger

whatwentwrong.site Observed source
Editorial interest 82/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

A diagnostic guide for deciding whether a bad AI result came from the instruction, the model, the task, the model choice, both sides, or no real failure.

Landing page captured for the 2026-08-27 issue.

Field notes

The site separates a user’s stated request from the intended constraints, the observable output, and the final verdict. Its six-way framework includes “wrong model,” “task blocked,” and “nothing wrong,” allowing disappointment to be treated as something other than model failure. Visible examples cover a replaced landing page, deleted unrelated code, and a generative image edit that altered the subject. The homepage also links to fuller cases and practical guides about instruction-following and code recovery.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

OpenPublic substance visible
PrettyNotable craft visible
ProPolished or operationally mature
NicheUnusually specific use
ƒJavaScriptBrowser-side code central

One card from the complete issue

Karunia Goes to Press

307,705 arrived 1,000 judged 999 catalogued Enter the complete issue
whatwentwrong.site

Landing page observed 2026-08-27. The live site may have changed.