Skip to the card

Card 011 of 9972026-09-10 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-09-10

ADSA asks whether your design system is legible to coding agents

adsa.space Observed source
Editorial interest 84/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

An open-source local CLI audits a design system on nine agent-readiness dimensions, scores it out of 45, and proposes fixes.

Landing page captured for the 2026-09-10 issue.

Field notes

ADSA evaluates a design system across nine dimensions, assigning each a 1, 3, or 5 and quoting the files that produced the reading. Its example report gives @acme/ui an 11/45 score, with gaps in agent instructions, machine surface, patterns, and verification. The proposed repair loop includes generated repository files such as AGENTS.md and GAPS.md, task briefs for work that requires project-specific builds, and a committed score.json for later comparison.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

OpenPublic substance visible
PrettyNotable craft visible
ProPolished or operationally mature
NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

All Approaches to Piccadilly

405,063 arrived 1,000 judged 997 catalogued Enter the complete issue
adsa.space

Landing page observed 2026-09-10. The live site may have changed.