Skip to the card

Card 011 of 9962026-09-10 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-09-10

ADSA asks whether your design system is legible to coding agents

adsa.space Observed source
Editorial interest 84/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

An open-source local CLI audits a design system on nine agent-readiness dimensions, scores it out of 45, and proposes fixes.

Landing page captured for the 2026-09-10 issue.

Field notes

ADSA evaluates a design system across nine dimensions, assigning each a 1, 3, or 5 and quoting the files that produced the reading. Its example report gives @acme/ui an 11/45 score, with gaps in agent instructions, machine surface, patterns, and verification. The proposed repair loop includes generated repository files such as AGENTS.md and GAPS.md, task briefs for work that requires project-specific builds, and a committed score.json for later comparison.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

All Approaches to Piccadilly

405,063 arrived 1,000 judged 996 catalogued Enter the complete issue
adsa.space

Landing page observed 2026-09-10. The live site may have changed.