Anunnaki Archives Keeps Archaeology’s Open Questions on the Record

Field notes

The archive uses four distinct formats to keep archaeological material from collapsing into one stream: site dossiers, cross-cultural threads, research updates, and a primary-text library. Its pages reportedly identify field visits versus published-report research, state whether a claim is peer reviewed or disputed, and attach source links and review dates. The featured Giza entry also separates a cautiously reported anomaly from a retracted paper and a much larger claim that was never submitted to peer review.