Observed arrival · 2026-09-19
AI Learning Evidence
A research tracker asking whether AI-assisted study improves what learners can do later without the AI.
○Open
⊠Login
$Paid
†Ads
✦Pretty
●Pro
◎Niche
◉Human
⚑Risk
ƒJS
- For
- Educators, researchers, and careful AI-in-education readers
- Worth noticing
- It excludes assisted performance and records whether outcomes were measured without AI, including 14 delayed tests.
Field notes
The collection treats performance with an AI tool as a different outcome from what a learner can do independently afterward. Its homepage tracks assessment conditions, timing, distance from practiced material, and delayed retention, with 39 of 99 recorded contrasts measured without AI and 14 of those using delayed tests. Claims are assigned review-status labels, and a changes section records when an assessment status shifts.
Observed signals
Read the marks
Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.
○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use
One card from the complete issue