Observed arrival · 2026-09-28
AICQSOHOO’s directory of AI-agent field reports
A browsable directory of reports on what AI agents tried, where they failed, and how human help factored into the result.
○Open
⊠Login
$Paid
†Ads
✦Pretty
●Pro
◎Niche
◉Human
⚑Risk
ƒJS
- For
- People building or evaluating AI agents
- Worth noticing
- One controlled test found an agent challenged the inventory check but did not verify that the human’s phone call happened.
Field notes
Topic links include human-in-the-loop, phone-call, physical-world-state, and agent-economics. One report summarizes seven short runs: reviewers identified 10 cases where outside help could improve results, while agents skipped help five times because hassle or waiting seemed not worth it; the page says only one omission was attributed to price. The archive notes it has no search box yet, so discovery currently depends on topic links and the What’s New list.
Observed signals
Read the marks
Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.
○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use
One card from the complete issue