Observed arrival · 2026-10-03
FrontierOrg’s fictional holding group keeps a scorecard for claims it won’t make
A public method, diary, and set of scorecards for examining AI adoption inside a fictional 50,000-worker infrastructure group.
○Open
⊠Login
$Paid
†Ads
✦Pretty
●Pro
◎Niche
◉Human
⚑Risk
ƒJS
- For
- People designing evidence-based AI adoption reviews
- Worth noticing
- Its org map filters O*NET 31.0 with heuristic department tags and links rows to ESCO v1.1.0 where available.
Field notes
The project frames its workforce and results as fictional or simulated, and says its GitHub holds the fixture, schemas, and generator. Its org map combines a filtered O*NET 31.0 slice with heuristic department tags, then links to ESCO v1.1.0 when a matching official row exists. The homepage also points to three fictional roles and a mock intranet sharing scenario IDs.
Observed signals
Read the marks
Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.
○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use
One card from the complete issue