Skip to the card

Card 617 of 9902026-10-06 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-10-06

A peptide–HLA benchmark that shows its work

peptidehla.com Visit website
Editorial interest 84/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

Stability Explorer compares models predicting peptide–HLA binding stability on grooves the models have not seen.

Landing page captured for the 2026-10-06 issue.
For
Immunology researchers studying peptide–HLA binding
Worth noticing
It excludes NetMHCstabpan because that model trained on the full dataset, and labels its structure view as a template rather than a predicted structure.

Field notes

Model scores use median per-allele Spearman correlation across 21 leave-one-groove-cluster-out folds, and the page explains why NetMHCstabpan is not a fair direct comparator for this dataset. Its structure view places selected residues on PDB 3GSN but explicitly says the peptide is not folded; the design tab ranks single substitutions instead of optimizing freely across sequence space.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

Original Bugs Included

353,261 arrived 1,000 judged 990 catalogued Enter the complete issue
peptidehla.com

Landing page observed 2026-10-06. The live site may have changed.