Observed arrival · 2026-10-08
CiteProof checks legal citations and quotations
A legal-brief checker compares citations and quoted passages with public court records, then groups results by what needs attention.
○Open
⊠Login
$Paid
†Ads
✦Pretty
●Pro
◎Niche
◉Human
⚑Risk
ƒJS
- For
- Lawyers checking citations and quotations in briefs
- Worth noticing
- Its Mata v. Avianca example shows how a valid reporter location can still point to the wrong case.
Field notes
The workflow accepts pasted text or .docx and .pdf uploads, then presents grouped findings with a counts line. Its examples show why identity checking matters: the Mata v. Avianca demonstration describes a real reporter location occupied by a different case. The site says free checks retain counts, timestamps, and a session ID, while paid findings remain for 90 days; it also cautions that attorney review is still required.
Observed signals
Read the marks
Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.
○OpenPublic substance visible
$PaidCommerce or pricing visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use
One card from the complete issue