Skip to the card

2026-10-09 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-10-09

MathVet’s OpenAI math fidelity audit

math.vet Visit website
Editorial interest 86/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

An independent, pre-referee review compares OpenAI’s mathematical-result summaries with their accompanying Lean formalizations.

Landing page captured for the 2026-10-09 issue.
For
Mathematicians and Lean formalization researchers
Worth noticing
Among 235 families with Lean formalizations, the audit distinguishes full, partial, weaker-statement, and supporting-only verdicts.

Field notes

For each of the 235 families with Lean formalizations, the review compares the repository's one-paragraph overview summary with its scope note, linked Comparator challenge statements, and their dependent definitions. Verdicts use the community's formalization.yaml vocabulary; the page says challenge configurations check against the statement using three standard axioms. The results are labeled pre-referee, and the site says a pre-registered referee round will be published regardless of its outcome.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

Are You Scared?

420,208 arrived 1,000 judged 984 catalogued Enter the complete issue
math.vet

Landing page observed 2026-10-09. The live site may have changed.