Skip to the card

2026-10-12 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-10-12

Check Loop makes AI review cite its work

checkloop.dev Visit website
Editorial interest 78/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

A Claude Code and pi plugin uses Codex to review plans, research, and code, with only findings checked against cited evidence able to block a run.

Landing page captured for the 2026-10-12 issue.
For
Developers using Claude Code or pi with Codex CLI
Worth noticing
A failed, empty, or timed-out review is retried once, then stops rather than being treated as approval.

Field notes

Plan review starts broad, then later rounds inspect only fixes; the page says six rounds are the default, configurable from one to 40. Execute mode snapshots the working tree before each step, runs a fresh subagent, then reviews the resulting diff without staging or committing. The page also says secrets are redacted from material sent to Codex, while warning that Codex can still read the checkout.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

○OpenPublic substance visible
⊠LoginAccess appeared gated
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

Unwinnable Employment

168,518 arrived 1,000 judged 993 catalogued Enter the complete issue
checkloop.dev

Landing page observed 2026-10-12. The live site may have changed.