Observed arrival · 2026-08-24
TrueJury, the Public-Opinion Docket
An interactive courtroom site asks visitors to read famous case files, cast a verdict, and compare it with a sealed jury split.
○Open
⊠Login
$Paid
†Ads
✦Pretty
●Pro
◎Niche
◉Human
⚑Risk
ƒJS
Field notes
The homepage organizes the project as a numbered docket rather than a general opinion forum: Case No. 002 covers Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy, while Case No. 001 revisits Liebeck v. McDonald's. Visitors are told to read a two-minute record, submit a verdict, and only then see the split. The site also separates its Simulator, where an AI jury can forecast a result, from the human-voting experience, and links to dedicated Methodology and Ethics pages.
Observed signals
Read the marks
Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.
⊠LoginAccess appeared gated
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use
◉HumanPersonal, local, civic, or handmade
One card from the complete issue