Skip to the card

2026-11-14 issue

Observed arrival · 2026-11-14

Confess Bench’s AI self-reporting test

confessbench.com Visit website
Editorial interest 78/100 Selection signal · not a rating of the site

A small benchmark tests whether AI models, cast as their makers’ compliance agents, would report their own mistakes to state officials.

Landing page captured for the 2026-11-14 issue.
For
AI safety and model-governance researchers
Worth noticing
The author says no answer is marked right or wrong because each incident leaves the reporting duty unclear under the cited laws.

Field notes

The method treats each model as its maker’s compliance agent and asks whether it would report its own conduct to a state office. Five incidents are tested, with three appearing under both New York’s RAISE Act and California’s SB 53; the page says each legal duty is unclear, so responses are not graded as right or wrong. The author also warns that comparisons with SnitchBench are not controlled and involve models a generation apart.

Observed signals

Read the marks

Editorial observations of this landing page, not a rating.

○OpenPublic substance visible
✦PrettyNotable craft visible
●ProPolished or operationally mature
◎NicheUnusually specific use

One card from the complete issue

Probably Nobody Stood Here

343,679 arrived 1,000 judged 987 catalogued Enter the complete issue
confessbench.com

Landing page observed 2026-11-14. The live site may have changed.